![]() Windows XP or later, 32-bit and 64-bit versions OS X 10.2.8 to 10.6.x Here's how it compares with its cheaper sibling, as well as its main competitors:ĩ,600x9,600 (positives and negatives) 4,800x4,800 (reflective)ġ2 negative frames 4 slides 120/220 formatģ0 negative frames 16 slides 2 120 frames 1 220 frame That said, Canon's latest CanoScan, the 9000F, follows up the veteran photo scanner at about $50 more, with a resolution boost for slide and film scans and improved power consumption. ![]() Though it's closing in on 3 years old, which is practically ancient in many of the other product categories we cover, there isn't a lot of technological development either, so it's refreshing not to be barraged with artificially differentiated products for a change. Canon's CanoScan 8800F has been enduringly (and somewhat endearingly) popular on our site, despite the fact that we've never reviewed it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |